🏆 Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Contestants must re-texture a SD unit model found in-game (Warcraft 3 Classic), recreating the unit into a peaceful NPC version. 🔗Click here to enter!
Duh. I mean if they arent pot anymore, means they cant be Potreants. Its like math!
Hippified Potreant => x(-y*a) = x(-ay) = -xay
Unhippified Potreant => -x(-y*a) = -x(-ay) = xay
X being the "hippie factor", Y being "pot factor" and A being the Treant.
So you see, two minuses eliminate each other in unhippiefied Potreant, meaning it should just be a treant.
It took me some time to make the equations simply because you messed in the logic - Hippified Potreant. It can either be Hippified Treant or just Potreant.
That seems right Al. Well, the math problem atleast. You made a fatal mistake with the factors though. Within the problems, you wrote with lower case letters, BUT at the description of what the factors meant, you wrote with upper case letters! Explain that, Mr. Gremm!
In the equations I use the small letters as it is usually written like that, in the explanations I needed to visually stress the letters, so I made them all with upper case letters.
It isnt incorrect. You would have to be an idiot not to understand that just because of the size of the letter.
Many places use big letters in descriptions and small in the equeations
It is incorrect, due to the fact that you can have both upper and lower case letters in a math problem. And those are most likely to different factors. And if you hadn't noticed it yet, you would have to be an idiot not to understand lots of math stuff. But still they try to simplify it as much as possible.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
🏆 Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Contestants must re-texture a SD unit model found in-game (Warcraft 3 Classic), recreating the unit into a peaceful NPC version. 🔗Click here to enter!
