Small one: Abomination

[LordDz]

I've always wondered.. Are there any difference between the Abomination and AbominationCIN model?

 

[BlinkBoy]

I see none from the previewer. Who knows, maybe they were going to add it some animations, but they left them back.

 

[Xezko]

Tauren chieftan has a CIN too, but i never know why! :S

 

[pkw]

lol it seems like Blizzard uses the (model)CIN for cinematic uses. But I don't see why they can't use the normal ones.

 

[Kwah]

I do believe Lich has one as well. Never figured out why.

 

[Linaze]

The lich has some small differences though, like some more golden texture around the head.

 

[BlinkBoy]

I think that I know the reason. There are no Low and Mid quality versions of the CIN models. So on if you have model detail settings on low, you will see the models at high resolution during cinematics.

 

[Devine]

Blinkboy = sherlock o:
seriously, how did you figure that out?

 

[NhazUl]

He has sniffed around the thing, I assume, and in the low res MPQ's. Btw, the abomination was supposed to be a hero model. It also had attack sounds in the beta.

 

[LordDz]

Nice find, so it's time to use AbominationCIN in cinematics then...

 

[BlinkBoy]

Blinkboy = sherlock o:
seriously, how did you figure that out?

don't know, I just figured it out all suddenly when looking at this thread for a second time.

 

[Xezko]

now, BlinkBoy, can you tell me what i ate for lunch?

OnTopic: ok, i think that this thread is closed now, rly?