DwarfSubmarine

[Moderator]

15:25, 22nd Mar 2008
Elenai: approved.

 

[Hawkwing]

Do a better screenshot. Sorry but all of these models are just Seige Engines with parts missing. I am not saying they are bad, i'm just saying they aren't very different from their original look.

 

[varsaigen]

yeah. I agree with Hawkwing. but you cant even see the sub completly. Its like looking at the top of a brickwall and asking, what is it?

 

[Mr. Bob]

yeah. I agree with Hawkwing. but you cant even see the sub completly. Its like looking at the top of a brickwall and asking, what is it?

Half of the sub is under water. No offence, but I am getting tired of people telling me my models have "just parts missing." I added parts! I gave it two torpedo tubes, an armored hull, removed wheels, gave it a scope thing, removed cannon, gave it portholes instead of window, long and slender now, removed attack anim, lowered the model for underwater use, and even took the time to add a better shaped rear end.

 

[Abokasee]

I think a sub-merge amination would be very good, maybe a attack anmin of sort (like stick a rotational cannon or something on top, make a good suprise artillary)

 

[Pyritie]

The unwrap on the front is a bit messy.

 

[Hawkwing]

Yeah sorry. Now that I can see the entire thing, it looks a lot better. It's pretty good besides the wrap.

 

[Devine]

the wrap on the front -like evry1 says- is messed .i don't get it why u ad torpedo tupes if there isn't an atack anim? plz add an atack anim it would look better.

 

[~Void~]

I don't like how it's just a siege engine modified, and imo the siege engine model isn't that great, but since it's the only submarine model I know of for WC3 that isn't futuristic, you get a 3.

 

[Faction]

Half of the sub is under water. No offence, but I am getting tired of people telling me my models have "just parts missing." I added parts! I gave it two torpedo tubes, an armored hull, removed wheels, gave it a scope thing, removed cannon, gave it portholes instead of window, long and slender now, removed attack anim, lowered the model for underwater use, and even took the time to add a better shaped rear end.

I think all of these models are excellent. They are simple, but I think their main strength is their simplicity, they're small in size, and quite useful. I think you've got a model to suite every possible vehicle need I've got! Besides, theres nothing I like more than a better shaped rear end.

 

[Schecter7474]

I like it. Its the simple awesome stuff like this that makes a good model. 5/5

 

[kryptosuper]

Ok I will give more suggestions on what u need to add or remove... u should make the periscope longer so u can sub on deeper water...
next thing is u should make ur sub a bit longer in length.. like the subs in red alert 2..

One last thing is : u should make water go out from ur sub in circle like aura..

thanks and good job making until this far though..

 

[Mr. Bob]

Ok I will give more suggestions on what u need to add or remove... u should make the periscope longer so u can sub on deeper water...
next thing is u should make ur sub a bit longer in length.. like the subs in red alert 2..

One last thing is : u should make water go out from ur sub in circle like aura..

thanks and good job making until this far though..

This model is very old. Outdated, and not worth my while. It's approved, so that's about all I care about.

Thanks for your ideas though.