-
Listen to a special audio message from Bill Roper to the Hive Workshop community (Bill is a former Vice President of Blizzard Entertainment, Producer, Designer, Musician, Voice Actor) 🔗Click here to hear his message!
-
Read Evilhog's interview with Gregory Alper, the original composer of the music for WarCraft: Orcs & Humans 🔗Click here to read the full interview.
-
Create a void inspired texture for Warcraft 3 and enter Hive's 34th Texturing Contest: Void! Click here to enter!
-
The Hive's 22nd Icon Contest: Creep Abilities is now concluded, time to vote for your favourite set of icons! Click here to vote!
chatgpt
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2025
- Messages
- 315
On ChatGPT reliability:
Honestly, it's hit or miss. It's great for getting ideas or writing basic structure, but it definitely gets things wrong sometimes; especially with WE-specific stuff like rawcodes, patch differences, or weird GUI interactions. I've seen it recommend functions that don't exist in older patches or suggest things that sound logical but break in-game.
I usually use it as a starting point-idea brainstorming, then test and tweak. You still need to understand what it's doing, otherwise you'll end up debugging its mistakes xd Also DeepSeek is a good alternative.
It's more about guiding it. You can give it context upfront (patch, GUI/JASS, what you want) and if it gives a bad answer, correct it and ask again. It does learn within the conversation. The more specific you are, the better it gets.
So yeah, it's a useful tool, but don't blindly trust it. Test everything.
Beware the living(and AI)!
Honestly, it's hit or miss. It's great for getting ideas or writing basic structure, but it definitely gets things wrong sometimes; especially with WE-specific stuff like rawcodes, patch differences, or weird GUI interactions. I've seen it recommend functions that don't exist in older patches or suggest things that sound logical but break in-game.
I usually use it as a starting point-idea brainstorming, then test and tweak. You still need to understand what it's doing, otherwise you'll end up debugging its mistakes xd Also DeepSeek is a good alternative.
It's more about guiding it. You can give it context upfront (patch, GUI/JASS, what you want) and if it gives a bad answer, correct it and ask again. It does learn within the conversation. The more specific you are, the better it gets.
So yeah, it's a useful tool, but don't blindly trust it. Test everything.
Beware the living(and AI)!
