Floating doodads is pretty bad.
I already view it and even ask some opinion from other terrainer, there is no floating doodads. Even raid1000 does not edit the forest terrain simply because there is no floating doodad at all.
and Arthas ended up winning becuase of Kelthuzad's frost nova? Cheap - not epic
KelThuzad frost nova are rather strong as well. If you view Arthas vs Illdan at undead campaign. Even Illdan get hurt by Arthas swords, what's more to said about the frost nova especially when it was a spells.
Make their battle last longer with more actions
My cinematic battle are design to follow the music theme. The music last about 3 minutes 19 seconds, so what do you expect from it.
Also, battle that are too long would make audience snore. I do not want a battle that last too long.
Remove the unessesary flashes
The flash are crucial to indicate what is happening or else there would be a lot of question regarding about it.
Have them both talk to each other angrily before they crushes in
Honestly enough, not every battle start with crappy talk. Who want to watch a battle where there is plenty of crappy talk before they fight?
Having a crappy talk before fight are like childish and more to kiddie behavior.
Remove the god damned Kelthuzad, he doesnt belong in it.
KelThuzad does belong in it, he was crucial in helping Arthas most of the time. Ever play blizzard campaign?
Make good story twists (unpredictable moves and events)
Those unique battle movement could only been done at JASS, this was done at GUI. Thus, the ability to do so was strictly limited. With limited animation at the models as well, it make the job even harder.
After all, those model isn't like black_stan model where you have several necessary animation effect for it.
I am only giving a 2 for the camera, good use of reduce animation speed, and reasonable flash backs, out of every part from this cinematic because those are the only thing that deserves rating, the other parts are bad I wont even bother with a 1/5 rating. So overall -2/5- (After all the suggestions I make with my other friends who also watched this we decided a 1.5/5 rating but I dont want to be too mean because i can see A LOT of effort you put into this) Many more spots to improve, good luck.
Seems like this rating was partially invalid as well. You vote it based on your taste rather than the work, you did not even mention what's wrong with it and straight away give 2/5.
And you're taking the comments way too personally Septimus.
I might seems to take it personally, that was because those user who give 1/5 and 2/5 gives a rather useless comment without mentioning what is wrong.
Those user who vote it 3/5 such as Amigurumi, bounty hunter2, and HFR could give at least half a dozen reason of why it deserve 3/5 and where is the flaw of the map is.
But what about those who rate it 2/5 and 1/5? Here is their comment.
Seems like you arent as good as you think you are.2/5.
Cant accept negative comments ? Fail in life.
With your arrogance and useless comments on others , this is not expected. With a totally unplanned cinematic. Maybe next time you should think of yourself before speaking. I do not like unplanned actions so i'll give it a low rate.
This is my opinion, DO NOT REPLY OR QUOTE MY MESSAGE, I can see efforts in camera but this cinematic is NOT epic at ALL. Yes flash backs, no problem, but what in the world?; Arthas and Illidan are trying to kick each other's asses and Arthas ended up winning becuase of Kelthuzad's frost nova? Cheap - not epic - bad twist of story
To improve:
-Make their battle last longer with more actions
(not just stand there and fires come out of nowhere)
-Remove the unessesary flashes (not flash backs)
-Have them both talk to each other angrily before they crushes in
-Remove the god damned Kelthuzad, he doesnt belong in it.
-Make good story twists (unpredictable moves and events)
My rating: Overall 2/5
I am only giving a 2 for the camera, good use of reduce animation speed, and reasonable flash backs, out of every part from this cinematic because those are the only thing that deserves rating, the other parts are bad I wont even bother with a 1/5 rating. So overall -2/5- (After all the suggestions I make with my other friends who also watched this we decided a 1.5/5 rating but I dont want to be too mean because i can see A LOT of effort you put into this) Many more spots to improve, good luck.
Tell me which part of their review was constructive and pointing the flaw of the map? NONE.
The only thing they give was just a suggestion, which are partially not suitable to be even implement to the map at all.
If user who vote it 3/5 can give plenty of reason why it deserve 3/5. How come those who give 2/5 and 1/5 cannot give the right reason for it?
The answer are simple, they are trying to downrate the map. I already seen plenty of people like this. Please write a constructive review if you want to rate, this is hardly consider as review.
This is my opinion, DO NOT REPLY OR QUOTE MY MESSAGE,
I got the right to reply.
Approved
