Trololol wars

[Moderator]

15:40, 19th Dec 2010
ap0calypse: Rejected

 

[light bolt30]

Fix the author name. Also please provide us info on how to play the map since I have no clue from the description. Those custom music isn't necessary for the map, it'll just increase the file size.

 

[H4MM3R_T1M3]

I know, but the music increases the enjoyment of playing the map if you like the music, plus it is a neat system.

I'll fix the information part as soon as I get home again.

 

[Ironside]

Review:

Pros:


Cons:

Lacks an author
Lacks a proper description (add features, how to play, screenshots, ...)
Lacks a quest menu, which tells how to play the map
The units should move themselves not just stand there and do nothing
Map name is completely unrelated to the map
Very bad terrain (add some environment to it)
You also need to put messages into the map for certain events


Overall 1/5, 10 votes for rejection.

 

[Serbianbeast]

Truthfully, a map with music integrated is just plain weird. Why? Well because of the fact that about 50% of wc3 players have their wc3 sound turned off.
Modify description so that it tells us at least something about the gameplay.

 

[Ironside]

Well true, but he has to have at least 1 thing in the Pros.

 

[Lambdadelta]

Well true, but he has to have at least 1 thing in the Pros.

That's not even a review, that's just a summary of features basically listed into two categories. Also, why? Why can't his map have nothing listed under the "Pros" category in this "review"?

 

[Ironside]

1. This is a review
2. Because I don't like the Pros category empty. But if you don't like it, I'll fix right now.

 

[GIANT_CRAB]

gonna test it.

Edit: I got troll'd by him.

The map is really lacking and doesn't provide good game-play.

 

[Ironside]

You should eleborate on why you rated it 2/5, does it have any good points compared to bad points at all?

 

[Lambdadelta]

1. This is a review
2. Because I don't like the Pros category empty. But if you don't like it, I'll fix right now.

I guess our definitions of review differ. To me, a review would be some gigantic analysis on the map, what was great, and what was wrong / can be improved. I simply dub yours as a summary of list - but whatever.

I don't really mind if it stays there or not, I guess it's nice that you try to give some praise to him with that one 'pro' (despite it really being a pro as it's too large in size). Sigh... I guess I'm just getting sick of the Maps section (srsly...).

What you've posted provides enough information to potential players of the quality of this map I would think. I guess a more user-friendly map would deserve a more thorough 'review' right? If a map doesn't tell you how to do shit, you give it a shit review and vice versa? Bleck, I dunno.

 

[Ironside]

Yeah I know what you're referring to, but these days reviews are shorter because there are a lot of maps.

 

[H4MM3R_T1M3]

Sorry, it has been a while...

It was a while since I last submitted a map so I forgot some of the basic stuff (all of them really...) I'll fix this as soon has I have eaten.

 

[Piitah_masta]

ohh afad