- Joined
- Jul 1, 2007
- Messages
- 6,677
It bothers me that winning a terrain contest, especially a playable terrain contest, gives less rep than making a skin. I think a map's terrain is twice as important (if not more) than one lousy skin. Discuss.
You got 576 rep atm, do you really need much more?
Terrainers are the most repped people in this forum, so there is no need to increase the rep prize. Also making a texture is harder, everybody can make a terrain, but not many people are able to create a skin.
Terrainers are the most repped people in this forum, so there is no need to increase the rep prize. Also making a texture is harder, everybody can make a terrain, but not many people are able to create a skin.
Who cares what the rep reward is? The very fact that 3rd and 2nd place even get rep rewards for such small-time contests is ridiculous. That it's a bit varied here and there is inconsequential.
Who cares what the rep reward is? The very fact that 3rd and 2nd place even get rep rewards for such small-time contests is ridiculous. That it's a bit varied here and there is inconsequential.
Terrainers are the most repped people in this forum, so there is no need to increase the rep prize. Also making a texture is harder, everybody can make a terrain, but not many people are able to create a skin.
Really, what's +30 versus +40 in the grand scheme of things? People are (Void is) just bitter that someone else can earn a higher amount of rep than they (he) can for different talents is all.
It's also not a big deal to change it. It makes sense that all art contests receive a set amount of rep, so why not make it that way?I actually wasn't saying that the rep system fails or should be removed. I was saying that it really doesn't matter if the reward bounces up and down a bit here and there. Really, what's +30 versus +40 in the grand scheme of things? People are (Void is) just bitter that someone else can earn a higher amount of rep than they (he) can for different talents is all.
It's all arbitrary anyways, so what good is it to complain? Just take what you get, wear it like you're the king of the world and be done with it.
Maybe no one is reading what I'm saying, but I am not actually arguing one way or the other. I am saying that it really doesn't matter. Sure, make them all consistent, that makes sense to me. Sure, make them all different, that also makes sense to me. You can't justify one way or the other, since valid arguments can be made for both sides. Just pick one, get your rep, and be happy.Gilles said:It's also not a big deal to change it. It makes sense that all art contests receive a set amount of rep, so why not make it that way?
LiOneSS, I think you underestimate terraining. I challenge you to take part in the next contest. We'll see how you do.
I actually wasn't saying that the rep system fails or should be removed. I was saying that it really doesn't matter if the reward bounces up and down a bit here and there. Really, what's +30 versus +40 in the grand scheme of things? People are (Void is) just bitter that someone else can earn a higher amount of rep than they (he) can for different talents is all.
It's all arbitrary anyways, so what good is it to complain? Just take what you get, wear it like you're the king of the world and be done with it.
If you take no stance, don't post?
LiOneSS, I think you underestimate terraining. I challenge you to take part in the next contest. We'll see how you do.
As you wish, Mr. Arena Moderator.Gilles said:If you take no stance, don't post?
I can't tell if you are insulting me or not. I wasn't trying to insult you at all, I also wasn't asking you to not post, I was pointing out that if you don't care, why post?As you wish, Mr. Arena Moderator.
I never did terraining, I am focused on art, while you have been doing that for ages. It would be the same as me challenging you to a texturing/modeling/icon contest.