• Listen to a special audio message from Bill Roper to the Hive Workshop community (Bill is a former Vice President of Blizzard Entertainment, Producer, Designer, Musician, Voice Actor) 🔗Click here to hear his message!
  • Read Evilhog's interview with Gregory Alper, the original composer of the music for WarCraft: Orcs & Humans 🔗Click here to read the full interview.

Footman3.blp

This bundle is marked as useful / simple. Simplicity is bliss, low effort and/or may contain minor bugs.
Is a good faighter
And he kill fast dragons

Keywords:
Warcraft:Faigheter
Contents

Dragon Slayer (Texture)

Reviews
20:18, 13th May 2011 shiiK: There's a tiny set of rules that your skin has to conform with in order to be approved on THW. You can find them here, along with all the other rules for resources, and the site as a whole. Please take your time to...

Moderator

M

Moderator

20:18, 13th May 2011
shiiK: There's a tiny set of rules that your skin has to conform with in order to be approved on THW. You can find them here, along with all the other rules for resources, and the site as a whole. Please take your time to understand the meaning of these rules, and if you have any questions, feel free to ask me or any other moderator available.

This skin does not comply with the Originality rule, nor the Shading rule. It is therefore, henceforth, rejected permanently.
 
This isn't even a good job of recoloring...
Definately should be rejected. It doesn't even have a decent preview either, seems he can't do anything right at all; not even CnP or recolor properly... I'm not trying to troll, but this is simply not good. Not to mention the fact that even if this was freehanded, I don't see any use for it.
--Not useful
--Recolor, no freehand
--Looks bad
--Bad preview

You need to read some tutorials, sorry man. Hope to see some better skins from you in the future, but this one is unacceptable...
 
Level 10
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
Messages
691
Never saw such a gay footman before.
What is this, bad red recolour with some even bader golden brush spamming?

[RAGE!]DON'T USE GAY AS AN INVECTIVE![/RAGE!]

Now, your skin is simple composition of some yellow brushing, a tiny amount of shading and awful langue, as pointed out by Trillium (And before spamming me with "You shouldn't judge the skin by description" read the rules, that is in fact a requirement for approval (Description paragraph)).

I would recommend to read the rules, and pay a little visit to the tutorials section.

Skin reported.
 
I'm not talking about the skin itself. The description of the skin was somewhat childish.
Of course, there are two possibilities to explain the description.
1: His primary language is not English
2: He's not educated
3: He's a child

One of the above explains the description of the skin. I am not saying this as an insult, I'm simply explaining why the skin lacks an adequate description.
 
Top