Nits Hero Arena v.1.8

[Moderator]

10:33, 4th Apr 2010
ap0calypse: Rejected

 

[Tank-Commander]

I'm intrested to find out about this map, gonna test then edit this post with a full review.

Edit: Right here is your review:

Terrain - total of 5 marks
Triggering - total of 6 marks
Origionallity - total of 10 marks
Difficulty - total of 10 marks
inventivity - total of 5 marks
Replayability - total of 10 marks
Object data - total of 5 marks
Total Marks possible - 51

1-10 unacceptable - vote for rejection (1/5)
11-20 lacking - vote for rejection (2/5)
21-30 average - no vote (3/5)
31-40 good - vote for approval (4/5)
41-50 excellent - vote for approval (5/5) (+Rep)
51 Epic/Godlike - vote for approval (6/5) (+Rep)

For a high Terrain mark the map must look beautiful/amazing, the terrain needs to make the game more enjoyable for the player as well as suit the game type.

For a high Triggering mark there must be no leaks and be efficiant.

For a high Origionallity mark, there needs to be as few of the same game type/genre as well as game style along with unique systems and suchlike.

For a high Difficulty mark the game very simply must be as balanced as possible.

For a high Inventivity mark the game should get around problems that other games may have faced before and achieved it well.

For a high Replayability mark the game should be able to be played many many times and still give something new to the player as well for them to enjoy it over and over again.

For a high Object data mark the map should have used custom resources/standard resources well, such as fitting icons, good descriptions and tooltips.

Terrain: 2/5 - very little terrain to be terrained and even that is very bland, you only really changed the terrain tile where it needed to be to mark things out.

Triggering: 1/6 - really, really bad - leaks everywere, waits, etc. you need to improve your scripting skills alot before your ever going to get a high mark for this.

Origionality: 1/10 - there are way too many of these, and sadly they are all much better.

Difficulty: PvP, as there is no learning this is N/A total mark is now 41

Inventivity: 0/5 - just no, none at all.

Replayablity: 2/10 - Highly unlikely people would want to play again, there are many more better ones than this out there

Object data: 0/5 - no custom object data what so ever.

Mark - 6/41 (1/5)
Rating - unacceptable
Vote - rejection
+rep - Definatly not

 

[-Kobas-]

If you need and help with making better description you can see this link
Click on me