Holiday gingerbread UI [Reforged]

[deepstrasz]

Are these made by you or just ported from other people's work?

 

[keepitmovin]

just ported from other people's work?

What do you mean?
A) Do you mean there are same existing files which i just re-adapted for reforeged
B) Do you mean there are textures, arworks, pieces of art, random pictures without ownership or which has no owners claim, which I fully remade into wc3 HUD by myself

 

[deepstrasz]

What do you mean?

I mean if the art is yours, did you draw the stuff? If you only adapted someone else's work to Warcraft III, then you should give credits and upload such things in the Ported section since it's not original and it comes from other media.

 

[keepitmovin]

Well, since for whatever reason, simple question of mine was ignored, i assume you have no idea how digital art being drawn, whats being used for that, how its being used, what is the reference, how digital art copyright works, who is the copyright owner of the digital art, what is partial ownership, sharehold, free-to-use, royalty free, intellectual property and etc.

And since that kind of question

I mean if the art is yours, did you draw the stuff?

I should start ignoring you, since you have no clue about stuff written above, but im afraid there are some more arrogant and ignorant people here, who may enforce on me dirty insinuations publicly, trying to make me say that "i do not own the art used as reference" which may let them think that i "steal" someones "intellectual property". So I have to give a complete reply to that SJW-clown attempt of a forum stalker who thinks he knows everything and has a right to make claims.

If you only adapted

That kind of statement proves that you are not related with any graphic software on an average level or above.
You have no idea what it takes to "just only adapt" a piece of screenshot into compelete different piece of rasterized graphic with whatever similarity it may have in the end.
Now im calling you ignorant, Senior Bob.

then you should give credits

You are not an owner, partial owner, initial artist, forum administrator or even a person who made an order for a digital art, which being used (or not).
But for whatever reason you are making a claim to give credits to someone. You dont even know whom needed to be credited (or not).

But the most hilarious and funniest thing is, for references used (in cases where they were used) its being told in descriptions for every thread created (i circled it with red color in paint for you [1] [2]). You were in such a hurry to put 1-3 stars with a fake polite "like", that you didnt even bother reading the description [1] [2], but still made an illegitimate claim to give a credit.

You have no right to claim anything and you dont even bother to make a simple research.
Now im calling you a clown, Senior Bob.

upload such things in the Ported section

I dont know how the forum works, if you want to help with that - go on.
But if you tell me what should i do related to the forum when you are not a forum stuff member - @#$% off.

since it's not original and it comes from other media

We again have to go back to the first article about ownership. But it would be interesting, how the person who has no clue about that, can give a definition for "original" art.

Are 2 basic photoshop patterns combined considered to be an "original art"? When they do and when they not? If same steps and technique being used by someone else might it be considered as "stealing"? When so or not? Im afraid these and many other question SJW-gymnast wont be able to pass by.

So how can you know if the "art" being used is "original" or not? Are you some sort of prophet or gypsy fortune teller? Whatver Marvel Superhero ability you have, your qualification doesnt allow you to see things they actually are. And more importantly how digital copyright works.

I guess you think your forum status allows you to speak any type of nonsense and make false claims you even have no right to. Thats very infant and pathetic.

p.s. funny rant on one of discord servers turned out to be an accurate description

 

[Tal'Rarity]

Well, since for whatever reason, simple question of mine was ignored, i assume you have no idea how digital art being drawn, whats being used for that, how its being used, what is the reference, how digital art copyright works, who is the copyright owner of the digital art, what is partial ownership, sharehold, free-to-use, royalty free, intellectual property and etc.

And since that kind of question

I should start ignoring you, since you have no clue about stuff written above, but im afraid there are some more arrogant and ignorant people here, who may enforce on me dirty insinuations publicly, trying to make me say that "i do not own the art used as reference" which may let them think that i "steal" someones "intellectual property". So I have to give a complete reply to that SJW-clown attempt of a forum stalker who thinks he knows everything and has a right to make claims.


That kind of statement proves that you are not related with any graphic software on an average level or above.
You have no idea what it takes to "just only adapt" a piece of screenshot into compelete different piece of rasterized graphic with whatever similarity it may have in the end.
Now im calling you ignorant, Senior Bob.


You are not an owner, partial owner, initial artist, forum administrator or even a person who made an order for a digital art, which being used (or not).
But for whatever reason you are making a claim to give credits to someone. You dont even know whom needed to be credited (or not).

But the most hilarious and funniest thing is, for references used (in cases where they were used) its being told in descriptions for every thread created (i circled it with red color in paint for you [1] [2]). You were in such a hurry to put 1-3 stars with a fake polite "like", that you didnt even bother reading the description [1] [2], but still made an illegitimate claim to give a credit.

You have no right to claim anything and you dont even bother to make a simple research.
Now im calling you a clown, Senior Bob.


I dont know how the forum works, if you want to help with that - go on.
But if you tell me what should i do related to the forum when you are not a forum stuff member - @#$% off.



We again have to go back to the first article about ownership. But it would be interesting, how the person who has no clue about that, can give a definition for "original" art.

Are 2 basic photoshop patterns combined considered to be an "original art"? When they do and when they not? If same steps and technique being used by someone else might it be considered as "stealing"? When so or not? Im afraid these and many other question SJW-gymnast wont be able to pass by.

So how can you know if the "art" being used is "original" or not? Are you some sort of prophet or gypsy fortune teller? Whatver Marvel Superhero ability you have, your qualification doesnt allow you to see things they actually are. And more importantly how digital copyright works.

I guess you think your forum status allows you to speak any type of nonsense and make false claims you even have no right to. Thats very infant and pathetic.

p.s. funny rant on one of discord servers turned out to be an accurate description

While I agree with you about the fact of how it is guilty until proven otherwise not just here but our current world too, it would be nice to state your sources even when it's free to use for I have learnt as well the hard and difficult way you are currently walking along. Innocence has no reason to hide after all, a guilty loophole is editing to the point that it is something new without permission with intent to distribute. A drawback is often sources are difficult to list, ironically in WC3 copyright often doesn't matter however the hive has history with trying to right that wrong even if they must be the villains.

I would like to add that it doesn't matter that your right when you give such an easy reason like this for that expected negative reply of power.

 

[deepstrasz]

Well, since for whatever reason, simple question of mine was ignored, i assume you have no idea how digital art being drawn, whats being used for that, how its being used, what is the reference, how digital art copyright works, who is the copyright owner of the digital art, what is partial ownership, sharehold, free-to-use, royalty free, intellectual property and etc.

I should start ignoring you, since you have no clue about stuff written above, but im afraid there are some more arrogant and ignorant people here, who may enforce on me dirty insinuations publicly, trying to make me say that "i do not own the art used as reference" which may let them think that i "steal" someones "intellectual property". So I have to give a complete reply to that SJW-clown attempt of a forum stalker who thinks he knows everything and has a right to make claims.

That is wrong of you and not a good or nice way to have a conversation, assuming things. That is a key element of arrogance and especially ignorance if you ask me.
I did not ignore your questions, I shortened them to what matters in relation to the site rules instead of beating around the bush having to continue with an essay like you wrote. I appreciate the details but those don't really help with the issue at hand.

But the most hilarious and funniest thing is, for references used (in cases where they were used) its being told in descriptions for every thread created (i circled it with red color in paint for you [1] [2]). You were in such a hurry to put 1-3 stars with a fake polite "like", that you didnt even bother reading the description [1] [2], but still made an illegitimate claim to give a credit.

I wanted to make sure you have not forgotten or omitted. If you credit some resources, it doesn't automatically make you a saint for any other you won't be crediting. In short. I should not assume this one is original simply because you credited others you uploaded.

I'm sorry that you use such a bad and non-constructive logic.
Do I need to have a mechanics degree to ask you if your car is stolen or not?

I dont know how the forum works, if you want to help with that - go on.
But if you tell me what should i do related to the forum when you are not a forum stuff member - @#$% off.

It's a free site. I did not break any rules.

Are 2 basic photoshop patterns combined considered to be an "original art"? When they do and when they not? If same steps and technique being used by someone else might it be considered as "stealing"? When so or not? Im afraid these and many other question SJW-gymnast wont be able to pass by.

Not if they are not originally made by you. I think it's fairly simple.

So how can you know if the "art" being used is "original" or not? Are you some sort of prophet or gypsy fortune teller? Whatver Marvel Superhero ability you have, your qualification doesnt allow you to see things they actually are.

When it's possible we can find out, when it's not we try to get the answer from the uploader. We want an honest community that understands that stealing is wrong and crediting should be done for everything that it's not theirs.

I guess you think your forum status allows you to speak any type of nonsense and make false claims you even have no right to. Thats very infant and pathetic.

p.s. funny rant on one of discord servers turned out to be an accurate description

Spoiler

Personal attacks won't help you circumvent the rules though. If anything, you might happen to break them.
I'm sorry you feel so emotional. Probably, I don't understand the hardship of porting things to Warcraft III from other games like DotA 2.

 

[keepitmovin]

keeps putting his own experience above copyright laws and talks about logic
doctors wont help

I would like to add that it doesn't matter that your right when you give such an easy reason like this for that expected negative reply of power.

accusing of stealing without evidence and proofs - "easy reason"
got you

 

[Archian]

Please keep a civil tone and use the edit button instead of multiposting. I don't think anyone is trying to offend you @keepitmovin . They're simply asking you to follow our rules. I think there has been a misunderstanding in the above posts which kind of escalated things a bit. I can understand if you got offended if this is indeed your original work - however, given that some of your previous works were modified versions of a Dota 2 UI, it's not completely out of the blue or wrong if someone asks you: Did you make this yourself FROM SCRATH or did you modify an existing UI. Simply post credit to the original author, and you're golden.

To avoid any misconceptions. The UI is very cool. Good job putting it together. And thanks for sharing.
But please remember to post credit - if this too is a modified version of a another UI?

And try not to be so aggressive, please. It's unnecessary.