1. Updated Resource Submission Rules: All model & skin resource submissions must now include an in-game screenshot. This is to help speed up the moderation process and to show how the model and/or texture looks like from the in-game camera.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. DID YOU KNOW - That you can unlock new rank icons by posting on the forums or winning contests? Click here to customize your rank or read our User Rank Policy to see a list of ranks that you can unlock. Have you won a contest and still haven't received your rank award? Then please contact the administration.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Ride into the sunset with the 32nd Modeling Contest.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. This adventure has come to an end. Congratulate our heroes in the 16th Mini Mapping Contest Results.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. From the gates of hell, the 5th Special Effect Contest Results have emerged.
    Dismiss Notice
  6. Race against the odds and Reforge, Don't Refund. The 14th Techtree Contest has begun!
    Dismiss Notice
  7. Check out the Staff job openings thread.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
60,000 passwords have been reset on July 8, 2019. If you cannot login, read this.

World in Conflict

Discussion in 'Map Development' started by Kofi_Banan, Dec 1, 2007.

  1. Feanor_

    Feanor_

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Messages:
    163
    Resources:
    1
    Maps:
    1
    Resources:
    1
    I would recommend either doing what Satomi said in making the sides identical, or in making the sides different but not in direct strength but rather having different capabilities. And one other (kind of major) remark. The MiG-31 was never meant for ground attack. The MiG-31BN which had ground-attack capabilities never went into major production, and was created after the collapse. If you need tactical bomber for the USSR try the Su-24 Fencer and Su-25 Frogfoot.
     
  2. Kofi_Banan

    Kofi_Banan

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Messages:
    666
    Resources:
    73
    Models:
    68
    Maps:
    5
    Resources:
    73
    Im still working on the balance, maybe im wrong but strenght/cost diffrences makes it more interesting. ( Tell me if im wrong :p)

    I agree that terrain needs a lot of work, especialy countryside.

    Feanor i may replace Mig 31 in future, for now i got more important models to do. Now i need M60a3 (i started working on it yesterday) and T-72( nearly done). Then Tu-95 and maybe B-52 for carpet bombing.

    I finished m-113 and m-163, also i want to add medical variant with red cross
    attachment on it.

    If you need not released models much PM me, i wont submit them until ill finish texture for US units.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Feb 1, 2008
  3. TheDivineBoss

    TheDivineBoss

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    4,562
    Resources:
    0
    Resources:
    0
    Nice, very nice.

    +Rep, I like it, it looks much better then that old one.
     
  4. Feanor_

    Feanor_

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Messages:
    163
    Resources:
    1
    Maps:
    1
    Resources:
    1
    I'd give more plus rep, but it won't let me ^^ the M113 looks wonderful. So how about the M113 being the parallel of the BTR-80 and the Humvee being parallel to the BRDM (or at least the same class not necessarily identical). Then the BMP can be parallel to the Bradley (like it is in real life).
     
  5. Kofi_Banan

    Kofi_Banan

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Messages:
    666
    Resources:
    73
    Models:
    68
    Maps:
    5
    Resources:
    73
    Here comes T-72 , im not happy about it but i have F. enough of dealing with the reactive armor. Now ill focus on M60a3 to put them in next map version.

    Hmm BRDM looks easy to make , ithink ill make it. Ill definetly go with your parallel sugestions. Altough BMP-2 and Bradley already are even.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Feanor_

    Feanor_

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Messages:
    163
    Resources:
    1
    Maps:
    1
    Resources:
    1
    Looks great. But you didn't add the dish to the turret. The sensor dish.

    EDIT: How about a towed variant of the Vulcan? Is it a possibility?
     
  7. TheDivineBoss

    TheDivineBoss

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    4,562
    Resources:
    0
    Resources:
    0
    Looks fine to me,

    strangly enough all those Russian tanks look like eachother xD
     
  8. Feanor_

    Feanor_

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Messages:
    163
    Resources:
    1
    Maps:
    1
    Resources:
    1
    Considering they're both of same class of vehicles (light MBT's) manufactured by the same country, with almost identical requirements for the two tanks designs......
     
  9. Kofi_Banan

    Kofi_Banan

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Messages:
    666
    Resources:
    73
    Models:
    68
    Maps:
    5
    Resources:
    73
    I added dish to the T-72 :p


    ==========================================================
    Is there any one who could test map with me?
    As my connection sucks i cant host.
    I give Rep and Credit for person who will help me :D

    ==========================================================
     
  10. Kil1er

    Kil1er

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    55
    Resources:
    0
    Resources:
    0
    Map is great, but not very realisic. m1 abrams not better than t-80, Ah-24 is too weak, MLRS and USA reparing car have smoke grenades, why? This Russia ability!
     
  11. Feanor_

    Feanor_

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Messages:
    163
    Resources:
    1
    Maps:
    1
    Resources:
    1
    The M1 is a heavier class of an MBT. It's by far better armored. It's problems come in the form of speed and logistics. This is where the T-80 really shines. The barrel-launched ATGM also helps with long-range engagements. Though realistically at that range you should be calling in arty anyways.
     
  12. I)eath2u4me

    I)eath2u4me

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    428
    Resources:
    6
    Maps:
    6
    Resources:
    6
    MEMME, ILL HOST IT FOR YA, I NEED REP LOL. Just lemme know when your available, and ill fit in some time.
     
  13. Kil1er

    Kil1er

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    55
    Resources:
    0
    Resources:
    0
    KofI, I think you need to add tress and destrybles crush ability for tanks. If you don`t know, how to do it, i can give you this system... Also I can give some good city doodabs...
     
  14. Kofi_Banan

    Kofi_Banan

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Messages:
    666
    Resources:
    73
    Models:
    68
    Maps:
    5
    Resources:
    73
    could you show those doodads ? :p , i know how to mkae crush ability, but dunno if i should really add it.
     
  15. James7

    James7

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    479
    Resources:
    5
    Maps:
    5
    Resources:
    5
    Yes, yes, show us these doodads^^
     
  16. I)eath2u4me

    I)eath2u4me

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    428
    Resources:
    6
    Maps:
    6
    Resources:
    6
    Thatd be very cool system of trees and stuff.
     
  17. TheDivineBoss

    TheDivineBoss

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    4,562
    Resources:
    0
    Resources:
    0
    Someone has been playing C&C:G(- ZH) too often :p
     
  18. Kil1er

    Kil1er

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    55
    Resources:
    0
    Resources:
    0
    Here map...
    It includes:
    -Trees and Destrubles crush ability
    -Some city destrubles
    -Strange Russian Veiches models.....
     

    Attached Files:

  19. Kofi_Banan

    Kofi_Banan

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Messages:
    666
    Resources:
    73
    Models:
    68
    Maps:
    5
    Resources:
    73
    They are property of Illidan, also i found my models edited. Ill ask him for permisson to use them maybe.
     
  20. I)eath2u4me

    I)eath2u4me

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    428
    Resources:
    6
    Maps:
    6
    Resources:
    6
    I know I've already said this but... KOFI, THERE'S SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOU...YOUR MAP SUCKS...AT SUCKING...IT CAN'T SUCK AT ALL. GAH!

    Woot, posts 210!