I'm not sure this is possible due to the minimap image being loaded then the map is loaded.
This is possible and we might add it, the only problem is the amount of types we need to have, would make a rather large API.
?
I'm currently working on a preprocessor that parses <A001,DataA1> in code and replaces it with the right value, just like tooltips does.
We're adding Set/GetTriggerUserData and Set/GetTriggerUserData, we wont be adding it with plain handles because of the risk of handle collisions. We might consider it at a later point tho.
This is a game engine thing, but i'll look into it.
?
We might add something a little more effective that trackables. But moving them around, i don't think that's possible.
?
This should be possible, might add that with next release.
warmachine does... but it's in alpha state an crashes alot and doesnt work properly (in something more complex)
stalking where the matrix is stored and remap it xDD)))) (joke)
function Two takes unit array u returns integer
local integer i = 0
loop
exitwhen u[i]==null
set i = i + 1
endloop
call BJDebugMsg(I2S(i)+" stacked units in the array.")
endfunction
function One takes nothing returns nothing
local unit array u
set u[0] = someUnit
set u[1] = someOtherUnit
set u[2] = someOtherOtherUnit
// etc..
call Two( u )
endfunction
Destructables.
Also a SQL-API would be good 
I'm sorry if I couldn't explain it well. I hope you understand my idea. 
?
Anyways with cmd you could open webpages in your browser or.... hmm... maybe an .exe to automatically update the map and the mod? However you're right, it could be very dangerous 
There's another problem with using MySQL, you have to provide a password and a username to use it, and since warcraft 3 doesn't encrypt or compile anything, that password and username will be open to everyone.
Actually, once we get warsoc up and running as it should, we have actually worked out a battle.net'ish type of map sharing and host lookup.WarSoc maps won't be shared over Battle.net though. It will require installation of WarSoc and downloading the map manually. Just like downloading a program, you don't have to run it if you don't want to.
The point of Reinventing the Craft is to remove limits right?
native SetClipboardText takes string returns boolean
// Object Storage this should be easy jet useful
native SetObjectValue takes handle h, integer value returns nothing
native GetObjectValue takes handle h returns integer
native FlushObjectValue takes handle h returns nothing
// This ones should be so much useful dynamic array
// jass
constant native NewArray takes integer size returns integer
constant native SetArray takes integer heap, integer index, integer value returns nothing
constant native GetArray takes integer heap, integer index returns integer
constant native DeleteArray takes integer heap returns nothinginline const jInt jNATIVE NewArray(jInt size)
{
auto int* heap = new int[++size];
return (jInt)heap;
}
inline const void jNATIVE SetArray(jInt heap, jInt index, jInt value)
{
auto int* pheap = (int*) heap;
pheap[index] = value;
}
inline const jInt jNATIVE GetArray(jInt heap, jInt index)
{
auto int* pheap = (int*) heap;
return pheap[index];
}
inline const void jNATIVE DeleteArray(jInt heap)
{
auto int* pheap = (int*) heap;
delete [] pheap;
pheap = NULL;
}
...
jAddNative(NewArray, "NewArray", "(I)I");
jAddNative(SetArray, "SetArray", "(III)V");
jAddNative(GetArray, "GetArray", "(II)I");
jAddNative(DeleteArray, "DeleteArray", "(I)V");
native ArrayAlloc takes integer size returns integer
native ArraySetI takes integer obj, integer i, integer v returns integer
native ArrayGetI takes integer obj, integer i returns integer
native ArrayFree takes integer obj returns nothingSFilip said:
