• Listen to a special audio message from Bill Roper to the Hive Workshop community (Bill is a former Vice President of Blizzard Entertainment, Producer, Designer, Musician, Voice Actor) 🔗Click here to hear his message!
  • Read Evilhog's interview with Gregory Alper, the original composer of the music for WarCraft: Orcs & Humans 🔗Click here to read the full interview.

Talking the ears off of these people

Status
Not open for further replies.
Level 27
Joined
May 30, 2007
Messages
2,872
It's a style of talking. Sometimes people want to talk that way. It is completely idiotic to restrict people from talking in a chatroom. The point of this mechanism is to stop:
Like somebody made a script that opened the sendmessage page 100 times.
That is more accurately called "flooding". The key to an anti-flood mechanism is to make it not catch humans, but to catch things like 100 messages per minute, which is way faster than any human could need to send messages.

Solution: make the limit longer. Make it catch bot speed messages, but not human speed messages.

If you don't like how people talk, then why the heck are you in an internet chatroom in the first place?

Sometimes,
Spanning lines,
Is desired.
For effect.
 
Level 14
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
804
Then you can wait a quarter second and continue what you are saying.. Really, if you are typing something meaningful and are at least typing like, 20 digits per line, you won't ever encounter this antispam system..
 
Level 14
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
804
All I can say is sorry, but it's crafted in such a fashion that it helps the chat mods more than it hinders the people that somehow manage to bump into it by accident.
 
Level 20
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
1,960
Oh jeez come on the problem wasn't about people spamming, it was about a bug with the enter key. I think the system is perfectly set right now so as to prevent spammers, because like Dusk said, you can just wait the 0.25 seconds if ever you do hit the limit. It's not that bad. I doubt you'd ever post enough messages to have to wait 3 minutes without noticing the warnings.
 
Level 7
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
512
My suggestion is not on the number of lines, but the content. For example, if you have the SAME content more than X times (let's say 5) in X time (3-5 seconds, maybe?)
you should get a stop, or something, or if it's random spam (1 letter, or gibberish)
You could use a custom dictionary for english, with things like 'lol' 'rofl' etc allowed, so you can keep an internet like chat but cleaner.
 
Level 17
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
1,598
My suggestion is not on the number of lines, but the content. For example, if you have the SAME content more than X times (let's say 5) in X time (3-5 seconds, maybe?)
you should get a stop, or something, or if it's random spam (1 letter, or gibberish)
You could use a custom dictionary for english, with things like 'lol' 'rofl' etc allowed, so you can keep an internet like chat but cleaner.
Bad idea.:mwahaha::mwahaha::mwahaha:
 
Level 24
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
1,812
My suggestion is not on the number of lines, but the content. For example, if you have the SAME content more than X times (let's say 5) in X time (3-5 seconds, maybe?)
you should get a stop, or something, or if it's random spam (1 letter, or gibberish)
You could use a custom dictionary for english, with things like 'lol' 'rofl' etc allowed, so you can keep an internet like chat but cleaner.

Too much hassle for nothing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top