- Joined
- May 16, 2007
- Messages
- 7,284
i like your 5th point.
Case in point Uwe Boll.There are some mediums that just can't work as movies ever.
Video games, for example. A visual medium, but such a vastly different experience than movies, which is why the movies based on the video games suck.
All of them. Every single one, without fail.
Case in point Uwe Boll.
Okay, how about a movie that sometimes pauses so you can read it like you would a book?There's a bit of both. There are many elements of books that are simply better left to your imagination, and there are many elements that you really have to see to truly feel. There are plots that are far too complex to be encompassed as a movie, and just as many that would be far too simplistic or boring to be written as a book. It really comes down to what you want to make.
That would break flow. When a person sticks a straw in another's head to suck out his delicious brains, you would end up drinking a lot less gooey brain juice if you had to take out your straw from the guy's head every so often and stick it in another person to suck. You would get less chances to immerse yourself in the oozing goodness of the human nervous system. You should choose a single person to feast on and finish before moving on to another. One delectable victim is reading, and another is watching. You should choose one and suck it dry before moving on to another for your meal.Okay, how about a movie that sometimes pauses so you can read it like you would a book?
Hulu, an evil plot to take over the world.Mmm...brain juice...