• 🏆 Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Contestants must re-texture a SD unit model found in-game (Warcraft 3 Classic), recreating the unit into a peaceful NPC version. 🔗Click here to enter!
  • It's time for the first HD Modeling Contest of 2024. Join the theme discussion for Hive's HD Modeling Contest #6! Click here to post your idea!

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons

This bundle is marked as useful / simple. Simplicity is bliss, low effort and/or may contain minor bugs.
These are adapted icons from the beta version of the Warcraft 2 Tides of Darkness.
The original size 38x46 increased to 64x64.

Versions with cannons fire does not exist in original game.

Keywords:
WCII, Wc II, Warcraft 2, Warcraft 1, Tides of Darkness, Orc
Previews
Contents

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Wacraft 2 Alpha Orcs Icons (Icon)

Level 7
Joined
Apr 14, 2019
Messages
30
Sorry, I'm not an artist. I’m just trying to improve what I have by virtue of my skills. These are original icons. They were such in the alpha version only smaller.
I drew a pixels of rectangles up to 64x64 squares and applied several photoshop filters. Full pack of icons that are not included in the warcraft 2. If some of them are of poor quality, I can simply remove them. If i redraw them it will lost original wc2 spirit.
 

San

San

Level 32
Joined
Sep 23, 2012
Messages
1,307
Due the recent change of rules we'll have to ensure the decency of every new icons, I'm afraid I cannot let the lower-quality ones to slide in.
I'll list out the one needing to be improved/removed depending on your take.

160993-ec0e37ecb39d3b1d723303c1ab3ba0cd.jpg
BTNOrcSkeleton - Generally too confusing, I have yet to understand its structure, can you provide me the original? I've attempted a search on the link you
provided but couldn't find a matching one.


160999-0511005ac52b47c9592b030e4df2adab.jpg
BTNOrcTrollDeastroyer - For unknown reasons to me, you decided to use the one with smaller resolution
TrollDestroyerwc2.gif
instead of the better one
OrcTrollDestroyerWC2.gif
. Scaling it up forcefully has created lot of unnecessary pixels, it looks dirty, clean them up, apply some highlights on their respective area, refine the messy pixels with pencil tool and move the ship to lower position so we can have better look on its sail instead of just sea waters, or, simply use the better one as base.


161003-c40fa09137c8bbd889983ed8dd59d255.jpg
161005-28215d4abb6ab1f6df9005785b051669.jpg
BTNOrcWolf(s) - Once again, it seems like a downgraded version from the original
WC1BreedFasterWolves1.gif
WC1BreedFasterWolves2.gif
, you should keep their shading and highlight so they don't blend in with their background.
 
Level 7
Joined
Apr 14, 2019
Messages
30
Last edited:

San

San

Level 32
Joined
Sep 23, 2012
Messages
1,307
289622-5643b5fbb46d852d53c16946a923a19c.jpg
It's better, but there's still quite a lot of unnecessary white pixels around the object/ on the sea.

289624-1355d08b9a672ee08d9fd7711976ba59.jpg
No, the old one has better vibrancy with highlights.

Yes, they're much better in terms of visibility now.

289641-6078a73304bdd773061db5303edd4dfc.jpg
Try increasing the brightness a little.

The others are okay, still low quality compared to average icons as mentioned, but for the sake of Warcraft II feels, they'll get a yes from me.
More opinions are welcomed, what do you guys say? @The Panda @PeeKay
 

The Panda

Icon Reviewer
Level 57
Joined
Jun 2, 2008
Messages
8,893
289622-5643b5fbb46d852d53c16946a923a19c.jpg
It's better, but there's still quite a lot of unnecessary white pixels around the object/ on the sea.

289624-1355d08b9a672ee08d9fd7711976ba59.jpg
No, the old one has better vibrancy with highlights.

Yes, they're much better in terms of visibility now.

289641-6078a73304bdd773061db5303edd4dfc.jpg
Try increasing the brightness a little.

The others are okay, still low quality compared to average icons as mentioned, but for the sake of Warcraft II feels, they'll get a yes from me.
More opinions are welcomed, what do you guys say? @The Panda @PeeKay

I agree with you with these statements as long as he does the edits you provided then we can change the authors up.
 
Level 49
Joined
Jan 12, 2010
Messages
1,771
The others are okay, still low quality compared to average icons as mentioned, but for the sake of Warcraft II feels, they'll get a yes from me.
More opinions are welcomed, what do you guys say? @The Panda @PeeKay

Honestly, those icons are mentioned in posts above are so crazy low quality that i've never ever give a chance to be approved in icon section. And as we can point that warcraft 3 modding is literally three and half people working on projects and even less - still play, i think these icons are useless, due no one will ever use them in thier projects. That is my point of view.
 

San

San

Level 32
Joined
Sep 23, 2012
Messages
1,307
Thanks for the quick responses, it's appreciated.

After having some talk here and behind, I've decided to put this into substandard mainly for their unfitting, aged quality and they are resources taken from another game(WarII).
News is we'll be getting a new section for ripped resources sometime in the future.

Note that people can still access to the substandards on the icon section, they're not reject/restricted.
If you have any question, Azazzello, feel free to ask here or use the Admin Contact.
 
Top