1. Find your way through the deepest dungeon in the 18th Mini Mapping Contest Poll.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. A brave new world lies beyond the seven seas. Join the 34th Modeling Contest today!
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Check out the Staff job openings thread.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Hive 3 Remoosed BETA - NOW LIVE. Go check it out at BETA Hive Workshop! Post your feedback in this new forum BETA Feedback.
Dismiss Notice
60,000 passwords have been reset on July 8, 2019. If you cannot login, read this.

Comments on Profile Post by Bannar

  1. IcemanBo
    IcemanBo
    I'm not very sure what you expect me to do.
    May 10, 2018
  2. Bannar
    Bannar
    And what, Gul'dan, must we give in return?
    -Everything
    May 10, 2018
  3. Bannar
    Bannar
    Ofc this meant shutting down the mentioned snippet. Current state of jass resources subforum is crappy at best. We don't want this additional weight to drag us down any longer.
    If you need a reason, just read the thread : )
    May 11, 2018
  4. IcemanBo
    IcemanBo
    I'm not sure I see it required to move the resource to graveyard. Why is this your goal?
    May 13, 2018
  5. Bannar
    Bannar
    Wut. Approval criteria are not met. It's plain as that.
    Goal is to clean up the subforum, because it is a mess.

    Look where wurst is. I'm using wurst because it is modern. However, because one cannot just scrap vJass, it is preferable for us to fix jass subforum.
    Doing nothing - which most users done for a very long period of time - does not help : (
    We need to:
    - remove resources not meeting approval criteria
    - fix existing snippets for 1.28+ (moderator needed)
    - categorize resources: containers, utils, events (...)
    and such.
    May 13, 2018
  6. IcemanBo
    IcemanBo
    Such single resources are not too important if they were approved in past and there is not a really good reason to have them removed today, even they maybe would not be approved by current mods.
    We also won't go through old spells and maps and remove those that don't match current standards. It's kind of wasted effort for the win.

    I believe JASS section can have an other focus than just moving this very resource because you doubt it's concept's usefulness.
    May 13, 2018
  7. Bannar
    Bannar
    Read more than just the first sentence.
    However, to sum up the "first": whatever you say about it, know this: it has more views/ replies than most vjass snippets/libs just because.. peps said it should be removed :)
    And because it's on the 1st page, it's like a red flag - avoid this subforum, nubs here :)

    One more thing.
    Reviewing old stuff is important. At least when speaking of such essential part as coding subforum. Term 'software development' without 'development' loses its spirit - ain't it?

    Otherwise, this will become another graveyard, just like wc3 and the helper are.
    May 13, 2018
  8. IcemanBo
    IcemanBo
    "it says nubs here" and "other say this, too", does not really convince me to now move an older approved resource to graveyard.
    May 13, 2018
  9. Bannar
    Bannar
    "I believe JASS section can have an other focus than just moving this very resource because you doubt it's concept's usefulness."

    Guess I have to copy:
    "We need to:
    - remove resources not meeting approval criteria
    - fix existing snippets for 1.28+ (moderator needed)
    - categorize resources: containers, utils, events (...)
    and such."
    May 13, 2018