• 🏆 Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Contestants must re-texture a SD unit model found in-game (Warcraft 3 Classic), recreating the unit into a peaceful NPC version. 🔗Click here to enter!
  • It's time for the first HD Modeling Contest of 2024. Join the theme discussion for Hive's HD Modeling Contest #6! Click here to post your idea!

Tyrael the Archangel

This bundle is marked as useful / simple. Simplicity is bliss, low effort and/or may contain minor bugs.
This model is not mine!


This is Expresso's Tyrael Model, not mine.


A beautiful model, but has some work behind it. This is a large model that may give your map some extra KB, but extremley useful.

This very Model was also used in the Diablo III Beta project presented by CloudWolf at our own Hiveworkshop. I took the liberty of finding the model again (I had it favorited), and uploaded it here.

Again this is not my resource, All credits to Expresso.

Keywords:
Tyrael EXPRESSO Model Angel Holy Ressurection Retribution Redemption God ArchAngel
Contents

Tyrael the Archangel (Model)

Reviews
11:06, 27th Jan 2009 General Frank: Nah. No permission. No ride.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Moderator

M

Moderator

11:06, 27th Jan 2009
General Frank:

Nah. No permission. No ride.
 
Level 45
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
6,982
You realy like to complain about stuff, dont you?
I like to point out when people in power do the wrong thing (doesnt mean i dont make mistakes), and to teach people they shouldn't encourage or rally on others to break the rules.

The rules are the rules, and unless you want to change them for EVERYONE and EVERYTHING and not just things a moderator or users think are cool then fine, as long as its reasonable. Its wrong to invent invsible rules for exceptions as its CLEARLY UNFAIR.

Besides, who says complaining is senseless when im pointing out power/moderator flaws in a system?
 
Level 3
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Messages
34
Model

Pretty good model, even though its not yours.

Don't like it so much, because of this slimmery things ( I know what they should be) but good enough for a game.
 
Level 2
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
17
Woah! Soo Prettaaay!!! definetly one of the best mods ive ever seen.....BUUUUUT....yep buts can screw any sentence up....look at the size of that model! i mean okay you can use it as a boss thingie but still its waaaaaay too much....:ugly:
 
Level 1
Joined
Jan 24, 2009
Messages
1
If he uploaded it, it means he wants people to download it, since he put a lot of work into it. It would be a complete waste of a great model to remove it.
 
Level 6
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
166
Can't you guys stop arguing and just accept it? It's a good model, it's usefull, and it was approved. It's also just not worth trying to get it removed. Although the file size is large. It would be better for a single player diablo map.
 
Level 2
Joined
Jun 3, 2008
Messages
11
Kimberly, you remind me of the foreman in "Twelve Angry Men" - He is small and has a napolean complex - I'm sure you wouldn't point out your own mistake if you had made one......so stop being such a wet blanket.
 
Level 2
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
15
lol, isn't what your doing spamming and is against the rules? The commenting of models is supposed to be about the model not debating the power of moderators. If you want to talk about this take it somewhere else... btw if your Elfen please don't kill me. xD

Now my comment about this model...

A great model but scary filesize. :O
 
Level 7
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Messages
294
Wow, can't you people stop denying the fact that this model upload IS against the modelling rules? Sure, it looks great and all, but most of you'll prolly spend that 1.2 mb in a multiplayer map. Campaign-only, I'd say.

At least you downloaded it, I don't see why you need to complain further.
 
Level 30
Joined
Sep 2, 2007
Messages
3,723
Can't you guys stop arguing and just accept it? It's a good model, it's usefull, and it was approved. It's also just not worth trying to get it removed. Although the file size is large. It would be better for a single player diablo map.

This is not about the model that's poorly executed or epic win. It's about The fact that all credits and such should be given the original maker of this model. Only he has the right to upload this unless he gave permission.
Not only is kimberly right about this, you are also completely wrong. Why the heck should we change our rules for this model? This submission is against the rules and therefor, it should be deleted.
 
If you search some of the old threads, you can download this model freely anyway.
So you don't mind.
Let's surch on old threads and remove this submission.
It's not the first time this model has been submitted.
It has been rejected the last time because Expresso has not given his permission.
Even if he don't mind you must ask him and inform him that one of his model has been submitted by someone else.
 
Level 35
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
5,366
This model will be most likely rejected due to the lack of permissions given by the original maker (said: Expresso)

Rule cited:

Models must be original creations or have received the original author's documented and verifiable permission.

There is no addendum that states a model may be uploaded without permission, based on its quality or use.

Please obtain written (verifiable) permission before uploading.

Thread Closed until final decision to be made by: General Frank.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top