• 🏆 Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Contestants must re-texture a SD unit model found in-game (Warcraft 3 Classic), recreating the unit into a peaceful NPC version. 🔗Click here to enter!
  • It's time for the first HD Modeling Contest of 2024. Join the theme discussion for Hive's HD Modeling Contest #6! Click here to post your idea!

Thunder Waterfalls

  • Like
Reactions: deepstrasz
(2)Thunder Waterfalls(v.0.55)

Storm, Earth and Fire... heed my Call...

I am the son of the Wind and Rain
Thunder beckons, and I heed the call
If I die upon this day
In battle I will fall

Hear me, brothers, gather up the wolves, (howl)
To battle, we will ride
Wardrums echo teh beating hearts
Pounding from inside

STORM
Black clouds fill the sky
EARTH
I hear my battle cry
FIRE
Thunder will bring forth
DEATH
From the Power of the Horde!
Contents

Thunder Waterfalls (Map)

Reviews
mafe
Welcome to the hive, Mr Goblin! This is a very good map. It looks both unique and "warcraftish", and has good attention to detail. I have a few questions/comments that maybe could improve the map furthers: -Forest are 99% dense, but there are a few...

deepstrasz

Map Reviewer
Level 69
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
18,806
@Wazzz description need 100 symbols xD
<=== Mr.LighT
BB CODES
BB Codes | HIVE

MELEE MAPS
Description Guide - Melee Maps
Describing Your Melee Map
Melee Map Description Generator v1.3

MAPS IN GENERAL
The importance of a Description
Description Guide - Maps
Map Thread Guide
Map Description Making: Good & Bad
Map Description - Templates
Map Description Generator [1.2]

How to Add a Screenshot to your Map Description

ADDITIONAL NECESSARY INFORMATION
  • A credits list in the map thread description is required where the names of the resource (models, skins, icons, spells, sound etc.) authors are mentioned along with the specific resource. It would be a luxury to have links leading to the used resources. Credits in the Quest Log would be appreciated too.
  • A detailed changelog in the first post would be helpful to reviewers and notify fans about the newest implementations to your map.
  • Map thread tags are important. Please use those that fit and not more or none.
 

mafe

Map Reviewer
Level 24
Joined
Nov 2, 2013
Messages
869
Welcome to the hive, Mr Goblin!
This is a very good map. It looks both unique and "warcraftish", and has good attention to detail.
I have a few questions/comments that maybe could improve the map furthers:
-Forest are 99% dense, but there are a few gaps here and there that could be removed.
-I would consider adding tomes at the natural expansions, laboratories and shops.
-The creeps at the merc camps and shops look as if the might accidentially attack units that walk too close. Maybe change the locations.
-Some parts of the map are "linear" in the sense that you can only go forwards or backwards, but not sideways. This also is the case on some ladder maps, but not as much as n this map.
-The distance between the main bases is relatively large for a 1v1 map. Not sure if it would be better to change that however.

In general, I like the layout. It is a very good thing that the neutral buildings are not on the edges of the map. Also, an interesting idea to put to "strong" green camps next to each other.


Still, theses are relatively minor complaints, but feel free to fix them nevertheless. Map approved.
 
Level 29
Joined
May 21, 2013
Messages
1,635
Welcome to the hive, Mr Goblin!
This is a very good map. It looks both unique and "warcraftish", and has good attention to detail.
I have a few questions/comments that maybe could improve the map furthers:
-Forest are 99% dense, but there are a few gaps here and there that could be removed.
-I would consider adding tomes at the natural expansions, laboratories and shops.
-The creeps at the merc camps and shops look as if the might accidentially attack units that walk too close. Maybe change the locations.
-Some parts of the map are "linear" in the sense that you can only go forwards or backwards, but not sideways. This also is the case on some ladder maps, but not as much as n this map.
-The distance between the main bases is relatively large for a 1v1 map. Not sure if it would be better to change that however.

In general, I like the layout. It is a very good thing that the neutral buildings are not on the edges of the map. Also, an interesting idea to put to "strong" green camps next to each other.


Still, theses are relatively minor complaints, but feel free to fix them nevertheless. Map approved.

raiting 4/5 acording to the review.
 
Top