• 🏆 Texturing Contest #33 is OPEN! Contestants must re-texture a SD unit model found in-game (Warcraft 3 Classic), recreating the unit into a peaceful NPC version. 🔗Click here to enter!
  • It's time for the first HD Modeling Contest of 2024. Join the theme discussion for Hive's HD Modeling Contest #6! Click here to post your idea!

HumanWall2

This bundle is marked as useful / simple. Simplicity is bliss, low effort and/or may contain minor bugs.
Note: THESE ARE NOT WOW RIPS, but models created based on the originals by Craka_J, author of "Wc3: Wow". All credits go to him for creating them.

Still in my opinion the used texture didn't feel close enough to the original models so created this re-wrap with alternate ingame textures.

Contains Wall 2. I have no idea why the .zip archive is called wrong.

Keywords:
Wow, Castle, Human, Wall, Doodad, Building, Fortification
Contents

HumanWall2 (Model)

Reviews
22:48, 10th Oct 2014 MiniMage: Model set to needs fix as we wait for proof that you have been given permission to edit his models.

Moderator

M

Moderator

22:48, 10th Oct 2014
MiniMage: Model set to needs fix as we wait for proof that you have been given permission to edit his models.
 
Level 8
Joined
Feb 2, 2013
Messages
97
Why not add death animations to these? It would increase its usefulness even further.
Btw, did you ask for permission regarding his models. Because without that, I will never be able to approve this.


... since this is now open-sourced project. :)

Craka_J said:
And finally, the Wc3:WoW Team is publicly releasing the mod and it's content - unprotected - in hopes that other dedicated aspiring mod creators will do a better job

Craka_J said:
If you have taken the opportunity to continue working on Wc3:WoW or have used the content in another project of yours, please feel free to advertise your progress in this thread!

Thank you!

I think that can be seen as a permission, but you can also leave this as "pending" or "needs fix" till he inboxes me back.
 
Level 8
Joined
Feb 2, 2013
Messages
97
open source != free to destribute
That's something often treated as equal mistakenly.

Edit: And uploading it to the resource section is not another project.

If he's saying that he's okay with using/editing the content in a "another project" like a map I would assume that also okay with releasing that map or/and it's contents on a site like hive since it would be kinda ridiculous doing maps just for fun. But as I said:
you can also leave this as "pending" or "needs fix" till he inboxes me back
 
Level 13
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
852
Using it in a map is not releasing it in the resource section.
I don't want this resource to be rejected but you are trying to justify the upload with false substantiations.
I just want to explain it to you.
The resource section is made for authors to showcase / destribute their own creations.
Another person can upload your resource if you give him a direct permission.
For example you can embed a screenshot of a mail where the author says that one can destribute it or if the author comments this resource.
Uploading a resource to the resource section gives the permission for mappers to use this resource in their map.
But the authors have be credited in the maps.
So you can't destribute these resources freely via maps.
 
Top