12:43, 17th Apr 2009 by bounty hunter2:
Why does it say map made by Velex? Map has bad terrain aswell. No resource crediting, poor description here, Rejected.

No ones even looked at it....

hey, dont be down illl try it

cool map, but there are a few things i would make better:
1.the scarab shoots a long, green plasma beam over a long range, but yours range is short and it shoots only single shoots.
2. Units cant take control points, you should change that, but only infantry, no vehicles.
3. make the buildings smaller, or create a camera, that you look on the battle from a longer distance.

otherwise it has a cool system to pick the races, the maps are cool and there are many units for diversified armies of each race. i give it 3.5/5.

I do agree with your first statement about the scarab not very realistic it needs some fine tuning but i do not agree units should be able to capture control points then the control point war would get even more annoying and it would eliminate the whole point of floods rushing strat with infection floods because they can capture control points and cost no food but if all infantry can capture control points it would ruin that anyway my opinion maybe author would change... but i don't think long range units like snipers would be smart for control point taking it would just be retarted. Also i personally like the wc3 normal camera is great the zoomed out cameras just piss me off. thanks for trying the map through... and thanks for commenting and telling what you think would make map better i'll ask author to add in a zoomed out camera option its easy to do and people like it

yeah ok, you're right with the flood infection forms... but i think snipers can really capture controlpoints, and i thinks its the target of a game like that that there is a heavy control war. i think you cant count flood infection forms as infantry either.