1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new Hive! Be advised that we're still working on the site. There are still many rough edges, so please bear with us.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. The 14th Icon Contest is still in progress (and may be extended). You can still make it in time.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. The 25th Texturing Contest has started! Contestants are to create a skin representing a dark elf person/being or any construct related to it using the vanilla models or the custom ones found on the site.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Buy it, use it, break it, fix it, trash it, change it, mail - upgrade it. Join (Optionally) Paired Techtree Contest #11 - Techno Magic now!
    Dismiss Notice
  6. Voting squad, line up! Cast your vote on the poll for Modeling Contest #29 - Squads!
    Dismiss Notice
  7. Hero Contest #8 is up and running! This time it's a joint contest between artists and coders. Go here for team matchmaking.
    Dismiss Notice
  8. The poll for the theme of our StarCraft II Terraining Contest is up. Cast your note now!
    Dismiss Notice
  9. The ninth Concept Art Contest has launched. Enter now!
    Dismiss Notice
  10. The member Kam is making HIVE coasters. Take a look. For every coaster you buy, Hive gets $1.
    Dismiss Notice

StarCraft Discussion (Official)

Discussion in 'StarCraft Nexus' started by TerranDominion, Dec 18, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Pr0nogo

    Pr0nogo
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    106
    90% of the work is done by interns. Evidence to this claim is shoddy gameplay product. Either it's the interns, or the game developers are horrible. You can believe what you want to believe.
     
  2. MGCǂSpectre

    MGCǂSpectre
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,997
    The only obvious around here is one troll. Everybody with a brain does esports because outsmarting your opponent and outplaying him requires times more thinking than making maps. SC2 while less micro-centered is exactly very strategy intensive. Also English isn't my native but I do not care how I post on a forum, it should be understandable for someone who claims to 'have a brain because he doesn't like esports'.

    He's posting single line crap repeatedly without backup and trying to get on everyone's nerves, ban that tard pls.
     
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2012
  3. Reaper51

    Reaper51
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Messages:
    664
    You forgot to add no lan or cross-region play

    But all negative points aside, the game is getting better gradually with each patch and expansion.
    Soon you will have more green points than red.
     
  4. Dr Super Good

    Dr Super Good
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Messages:
    21,164
    Please take your ignorance somewhere else. If you understood the software development process or even what an intern is you would be laughing at what you just said.

    The game play is not horrible, just BattleNet 2.0 is missing important features. It was clear this would be the case when Blizzard announced a definite release date for StarCraft II before it had started work on BattleNet 2.0. If you like WarCraft III you will like StarCraft II once enough diversity is introduced.
     
  5. Pr0nogo

    Pr0nogo
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    106
    WarCraft III has quite a few issues that were never fixed, and more issues that came from patches. I don't like WarCraft III's melee play as much as StarCraft: Brood War's because it forgoes a simple complexity and a balanced setup for a ridiculous amount of flowery abilities and an impossible-to-balance mix of melee unit types.

    StarCraft II is similar, albeit with a more short-sighted take on unit types and abilities. Instead of making that the focus of the imbalance, StarCraft II puts the imbalance in unit groupings. With the million man march, if the Terrans reach critical mass (which is about ten of each unit type, or less), the game is pretty much over. Protoss have a similar system with Immortals, Blinkers, Rangeossi, and Chargelots, but they can easily be overcome by the Terran's million man march and some spare Vikings. Zerg doesn't have an over-powered ball; it's actually the most balanced race out of all of them, but they seem like the weakest because of the high power of the other two races.

    Now, let me reiterate my point; I don't believe that Blizzard's development team could possibly design something as fun as StarCraft: Brood War and then go on to design something as unbalanced and un-fun as StarCraft II. That's why I apply the responsibility of the game to interns. If you like StarCraft II, you like a bad game, and that's fun. Plenty of people do. You guys just have to deal with that stigma. That's all.
     
  6. MGCǂSpectre

    MGCǂSpectre
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,997
    SCBW is probably the most balanced game from the 3, even War3 didn't reach it in level of balance, but SC2 is so early that it's early to talk about what is not made.

    But SCBW also had melee and it also had esports. So go on, bash SCBW's melee too cause you suck at all three.

    Funny how some mapmaker expects that anything he says matters when any melee is much more brain consuming than your maps.

    ------
    DSG since HotS is taking more time than even D3 seeing how its release date is still not announced, maybe Blizzard are learning from their mistakes and this time they will make sure nearly all is fine before it goes public. Though some bnet features are nowhere announced to be made. Still, I think this is like cultural shock - we all get used to War3 and all its bnet then when we go to the new Bnet 2.0 - omg everthing is so different. Then, the more you stay in SC2 Bnet the more you get used to it.

    It did so for me and many others who were also complaining of missing features back in SC2 Beta. I no longer care about bnet features really and any real gamer stopped caring what features is not there.

    The rest is like 'why is my marine not changing clothes like in WoW' like WoWtards would say, i.e complaints of that kind - pointless complaints. There is what to do on Bnet 2.0 but hardly matters anymore now, does it?

    And I thought HotS was gonna come before D3, that only means they are giving more attention to the expansion than D3 atm which is nice.
     
  7. Pr0nogo

    Pr0nogo
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    106
    SCII has been out for several years now, and they've made the balance markedly worse than it was several times before.

    StarCraft had well-balanced melee; StarCraft II does not, and likely never will, much like WarCraft III. There's too much going on, and the development team has shown very little competence thus far, in terms of fixing anything.

    Calling me names, insulting my level of play, and referring to me as a retard is not going to get you anywhere in the argument. You look stupid enough with a pony for an avatar. Maybe you should spend more time watching that show and less time insulting people who have, somehow, gotten you so angry and self-conscious that you feel the need to lash out at them. I do apologise for referring you as brainless. Hopefully, you can stop thrashing about over the internet.
     
  8. Dr Super Good

    Dr Super Good
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Messages:
    21,164
    Pr0nogo, who are you to know what balance is? Statistics show that all 3 race matches have approximately a 50% win ratio. Deviations do occur but that is all in the expected distribution. To me this looks perfectly balanced.

    Why are you so against interns? I have to do one this summer with some company so are you saying I am stupid and what I will produce is useless? How dare you insult me like that. Who are you to even comment? I am on track for an Electronic and Software Engineering degree, are you? Do you even know how software is created?

    You are comparing a 13 year old game with an expansion to a two year old game without an expansion? Seems rather stupid to me since a lot of balance changes have been made to that game over the last 13 years. If you want to compare Brood Wars you will have to compare it to Heart of the Swarm.

    Show me a single release patch that made a persistent change that made balance worse? Explain how the game can even be called imbalanced when statistics from masters and professional matches are showing a 50% win ratio for each race in un-even matches.

    The reason is that they are also working on Blizzard DotA for it which is as good as a separate game. On top of this the campaign reuses very little content from WoL and they even said they were avoiding recycling content. Everything from the texture sets to the doodads are new. They also cannot release two games at the same time without competing with themselves so it is clear they are delaying HotS until after D3 and MoP.

    To apologise for this delay they are releasing a patch soon that will modify BattleNet and StarCraft II Editor in many positive ways.
     
  9. MGCǂSpectre

    MGCǂSpectre
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,997
    So I am stupid because I use a pony avatar? Lol I think that argument backfires at who's stupid. In fact, lots of players called their user names MyLittlePwny and things like that - while being Master, I would never call my main acc like that if not some training, so does that make them stupid too? At least im not THAT big fan of the show, but why does this even matter?

    No, you should apologize to calling esports for no brainers, not to me because this shows where you are, one clueless noob. I'm not a pro player but having played 5K 1v1 games on War3 and now in SC2 above 1000 games, I need just some silly comments to know where a person is in skill and how much he understands the game. There are Bronze players who are smarter than some whiny bitches, so I don't care about the league which yours is not high anyway.

    Balance? Sure there is what to do in SCII. Years? Only a year and soon 2 years. Ok with Beta it's 2 years and 2 months. War3 balance? Both are not as balanced as SCBW but since SCBW is the oldest and they had the most time and War3 kind of died after SC2 came.. maybe it is explainable?

    Do you think your balance is the reason why you suck, kid? Nope. Balance doesn't matter to you, balance is only on highest level where players can't get any further, for you it is just LACK OF SKILL.

    Just don't diss something that you suck at, that's what im gonna tell you. Go make your maps and shut up.
     
  10. Pr0nogo

    Pr0nogo
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    106
    The news I saw a few weeks ago did not yield those results. Perhaps I am judging the game off of defunct data. Comparing that data to the lower level leagues also yields far more staggering results. Some really funky balance stuff happens on the lower levels, so check out some examples on YouTube or something before you tell me that lower-level play doesn't matter. That's like saying people who play on leagues lower than Masters don't matter, and I'm sure they would take offence to that.

    Of course, who am I to talk? Clearly, I have offended quite a few people. Still, I thought you might like to know, because nobody should intentionally offend anyone.

    On the subject of who I am to talk balance, I am someone who has beta tested every one of Blizzard's games since 2002, when I beta tested WarCraft III's expansion and witnessed quite a few changes to balance. I have quite a few years looking at this stuff under my belt. I would think my opinion should carry some weight, since I also beta tested StarCraft II. In my opinion, they had a bit better balance back then.

    This is probably where I should just stop talking to you, because these points are hilariously reminiscent of a fully-grown adult who was insulted by someone ten years his younger. But, I'm bored, and it's half past four, so why the fuck not?

    I am against interns in Blizzard games because they have shown to significantly reduce the enjoyment I get from playing a game. Interns made me want to toss my monitor out the window while modding StarCraft and it's expansion. Interns made me extremely frustrated trying to change around sound assets in Diablo II. Interns made me laugh in horrific disbelief at the backward systems of WarCraft III's trigger and camera settings. Interns made me cry a wittle bit on da inside when I played StarCraft II's campaign. What did interns do so wrong in this game, though?

    Interns did most of the voice acting. That was cringe-worthy.
    Interns did the level designs. None of them felt like StarCraft. I don't mean the first game, I mean the universe. It felt foreign, and not the kinky Asian-Latino transexual stripper kind of foreign; the bad kind of foreign.
    Interns made the new data editor a helluva lot more complicated than it had to be. I would have preferred WarCraft III's, with more assets to configure. The new way might have one or two new options, but sacrificing those so I could lose the 'let's create 1240890 other things to make one new unit' thing. That'd be real nice.

    Let me make one thing perfectly clear. I don't think YOU are stupid because you are going to take part in an internship. I may think you are stupid for a legion of other reasons, or I may think you are a completely capable and functional gentlemen of today's society. You can decide for yourself what you think I think, just as you can decide whether or not what I think means anything to you. How dare I possibly think something you don't think, right?

    You see, unless an intern really loves his or her role, they have no reason to do a good job on their product. The company will get rid of them after a while, and they know it. That's got to have been it, I think. Either that, or interns aren't responsible for this at all, and I should be blaming the actual in-house Blizzard development team for all of my complaints. You yourself told me not to do that, so...

    StarCraft's latest patch was in early 2007, unless 1.16.1 was patched over just now. That effectively makes it a 9 year old game, so watch your numbers. Confusion does not make a good debate.

    It is true, a lot of balance changes have been made. Perhaps it is a bit early to judge. In the time it takes Blizzard to release new patches, though, we can all sit back, enjoy a soda, and laugh at how pitiful the rest of the game is, right? I mean, we can all agree at the level of crap the campaign, UI, and new battle.net "features" add up to, right? Hahaha! Ha! ... Ha... Yeah.

    I suppose I'm so tough on Blizzard because they should have learned from their past patches. That, and...

    Well, you have called me stupid and your buddy here calls me retard and troll regularly. None of these statements are true, and still it happens. Crazy, right?

    Here's your patch notes.

    I could go on.

    I certainly hope it succeeds.

    You're asking me a lot of really stupid questions, and my answer to them all is no. However, it is very interesting how you seem to be so easily riled up and so very self-conscious about watching a female children's television show. Particularly;

    I actually really love that you followed it up with,

    You've struck gold, son. It doesn't.

    Well, since all my apology did was make you angrier and more cuss-prone, I'll retract it. I'm not sorry, and I hope we can't be on 'I don't care about you at all because I've never met you' terms again. Did that make you feel better, or...?

    I am sincerely confused. You rejected my apology, but then told me I should apologise to people I've never met before. I don't care if I insult them. I don't know if this is something you've never thought of, but do you care when you tell the funny racist jokes or funny sexist jokes to your buds? Not really. You get the feels-good-man feeling from making them laugh at your faux-bigotry, and that's fine. I do it all the time. You don't feel guilty for insulting people - people who you have never met, and who you have no intention of meeting, ever. Such a notion is silly, and you should not confine your life to this close-minded standard.

    As for my intelligence and my skill, only one is lacking. Can you guess which one it is? I never did claim to be a stellar player, after all...

    I'm glad you can make up your mind about someone's skill after a few hundred hours of gameplay. I might be able to grow up to be like you, someday.

    I wonder if you'd sound even more self-consumed in person...

    Your nitpicking and semantics of my 'years' statement is not only stupid, it's wrong. It's stupid because you're exhibiting the same level of 'irritated assbasket' as that guy who says "It's not five, it's four fifty-eight!" when you tell someone what time it is. It's wrong because plural can refer to fractions and decimals, so as soon as it's that infinitely-smaller-than-smallest fraction of time past a year, it's been years.

    Maybe the lack of proper balance is explainable. I've already touched upon this issue with the good doctor, though, so I'll let you exercise your reading skills up there instead of down here.

    Last time I checked, I was completely balanced. Maybe it's that chicken from Wendy's...

    No, I think I'm good.

    I really don't see how you demeaning my level of skill in StarCraft II is going to make you any more correct. You've committed ad hominem so many times that I have lapsed into doing the same back to you, in a far more sarcastic, haughty, condescending manner. That's not something I do often, but I quite enjoy it now that it's become obvious to any outside observer with a brain (ooh, said it again! burn!) that you are incredibly self-absorbed and have no place in an intellectual debate. I actually reported your post for this reason, but decided that I'm better off showing everyone both of our true colours, rather than hiding them.

    The scenario of players never being able to improve is also staggeringly improbable. Even if we were to set aside semantics of "his reaction time is .002 seconds faster now!" scenarios, players can always learn new things and they can always get better. There is no way you are going to sit there, tell me that people in high Masters are the glowing form of perfection amongst StarCraft II players, and even think for a second that I will take you seriously.

    I suppose we could just chock this up to your LACK OF INTELLIGENCE. Quick, kill that Centaur Sorcerer and take his +2 tome! You might even level up...

    The notion of you telling me what to do over the internet is quite alike the notion of that thirteen year old kid playing HALO: Reach, calling everyone a 'faggot' or a 'gay person' while he does so. You're not that tough, bro, and I wouldn't let you come anywhere near me even if I were gay.

    inb4 'u r gay u dum bass' statement (it's a multiple entendre, get over it)
     
    Last edited: Apr 8, 2012
  11. MGCǂSpectre

    MGCǂSpectre
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,997
    So being a beta tester makes you think you understand it all? LOL. I was in SC2 Beta too and I've played War3 in beta too, but I played 1K games over SC2's release to see where I am and since I'm a War3 player and as such I still don't find it easy to macro the entire map, I still don't whine about balance cause it is all practice and skill.

    And any pro player will have much bigger insight on balance than me, heck any player with twice as much more games will have it. The same way someone with twice/times as less games will have less understanding and will complain about balance..

    Though I have to agree some of the balance things were unnecessary while others were needed.

    But still you can't blame losing and winning due to balance if you're not some Grandmaster, yes even whiny Masters posting at sc2 blizzard forums are suckers - at higher level suckers lol but at least as Master they have more reason to post than some low leaguer cause low leagues - Gold, Platinum Diamond all the same, in Master it starts to matter

    and that's why they Removed LOSSES for Under Master cause in Master and up it matters (which however I am not fan of) but for whiny Fun Gamerz like some mapmakers or Tower Defensers who cry about getting too many losses they removed the Losses for ALL. Not optional, just forced.

    Some features did make it look like kids background and not a real competitive ladder. Losses removal is one of them so im not some blind Blizz fanboy, all know the critics I posted about this all but liek everyone else I stopped caring. I just have to get over it and be Master to get my wins/lsoses stats not just wins.

    And when it comes to losing from races, it is skill but for Ghosts nerf - it was one because they snipe the Broodlords and they did reduce the damage from Snipe against non-casters. Still OK vs casters.. that much you understand.

    Situation Report

    have you watched IMMVP vs Nestea in Blizzcon 2011 Finals, game 3? I thought so.

    Who teaches you at school these days to argue by any means necessary and with anyone? Is this supposed to be correct or something? Wrong, wrong system, always have to say something even when wrong.
     
    Last edited: Apr 8, 2012
  12. Pr0nogo

    Pr0nogo
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    106
    I don't play the game anymore, so my 'whining' is mostly just complaints from memory and from long-standing issues I've had with its single-player aspects. That's why I bring up being a beta tester; I've seen how the game was then, and it was better than patch 1.4.2. I haven't played the latest patch.

    So my opinion is completely and utterly invalidated because of some misconceived penumbra in a silly SUPER ADVANCED math equation you figured out? Hmm...

    I think everyone's enjoyment matters. If you payed for the game, and you suck, you should be able to find enjoyment in the singleplayer aspect. I can't find enjoyment in that, and I can't find enjoyment in the multiplayer aspect. Do I suck? Maybe. Do I have a reason to complain? Yes. Does not being in Masters league mean that my complaints are invalidated and horribly misconceived? Not one bit.

    Very defencive attitude you've got there. I never called you that.

    Brood Lords and Overseers make short work of Ghosts...

    I have a brain, remember? :ogre_hurrhurr:

    Yeah, you should move to a place with better education.
     
  13. MGCǂSpectre

    MGCǂSpectre
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,997
    ^ Probably, but Im being objective and I know when to shut up unlike you, like if I were to argue with someone much better than me, which is much better than arguing for the sake of arguing. Nice teaching, it produces arrogant kids.

    So you are a fun player you play for the lolz and some lolz maps and you complain about balance? lololol

    You did not even grasp the change that was made about Snipe but since 'no brainers' decide the balance you complain about it? When the 'no brainers' have tons more insight on why smth needs a balance.

    See? You dont know when to shut up. If you paid for a game to enjoy then DONT Play ladder, Blizz explicitly said their focus is esports.
    If you don't like esports, that's your opinion, dont diss it,. don't bash it when it is just you, dont cry about balance, people are playing it to compete, they did enough Kiddies Playgrounds around for fun gamers, then what are you doing here crying about thing you don't like doing? Because of such like you they removed losses.

    It's like me coming to whine why the editor is so hard to use when some people are much more into it than me, not only do I not whine, but I actually started learning it, not cry.

    I PAID for the game? Why can't my map magically be ready? Where is my magic wand? Blizz pls make the Editor AUTO MAKE READY MAPS cause I'm noob at it
     
  14. Pr0nogo

    Pr0nogo
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    106
    You're being self-absorbed agaiiiiin.
    I'm not even going to give you the benefit of the doubt anymore.

    Simplification can work wonders for your arguments, but don't strawman. I can see straight through that shit, brah.

    I don't play, period. When I did play, I did not play competitively. From there on, you are incorrect in assuming that this somehow makes my complaints invalid. I'm sure you have some opinions on the Galaxy Editor or the storytelling, whether or not they're positive or negative. By your logic, your opinions on those subjects are invalid.

    Are you writing this on your phone, or are you just bad at typing? I'll assume the latter for now, since you lack sentence structure altogether.

    I grasped the change perfectly; I don't agree with it. That's why I brought it up. I view it as a bad change. This, in no way, makes me somehow incapable of realising why someone thought it was a good idea.

    Then my contention is that they should have focused on making all facets of their game good, rather than pouring all the resources that truly mattered into gameplay - something I still find lacking, despite all of these efforts.

    You don't like me or my viewpoints. That's your opinion. Don't diss them. Don't bash them when it's just you (what the fuck does that even mean?). Don't cry about how they're different. Plenty of people agree with my viewpoints. There are also people who think like you do. Why are you even here, crying about my viewpoints? It's because of you that some moderator somewhere might delete or edit my posts.

    If you didn't find that paragraph stupid, you are beyond redemption.
    If you did, you are a hypocrite.

    Actually, it isn't like that at all.

    Not once at all did I ever say to myself (or to Blizzard, or to anyone, nor anything),

    I paid for this game. Why can't I magically be in Masters league? Where is my magic dildo? Blizzard, please make all other players play really really poorly so I can be the god of StarCraft II's melee, because I'm too lazy to learn how to play for real!

    No. I discussed balance. I discussed gameplay.

    You? You haven't discussed either of those. You have yet to discuss something beyond your self-absorption. You know what? I think you need to grow the fuck up, or ship the fuck out.

    Actually, it'd be nice if you did both. I can't force you to become more intelligent. I can't force you to become less self-absorbed. I don't want to, either; I want you to work for it. I want you to achieve intelligence. That's what I want. Then, you can come back. Then, you can lay out your reasons and your viewpoints. Then, you can ask me to debate with you.

    Then, I will listen. Then, we will debate.

    Now, however, nothing you say will be counted for anything - not to me, at least. I will not respond to you. I will report you a second time if you ever send me a vulgar PM again. I will ignore you. I won't hold my breath waiting for you to get smart, either.

    I'm more than willing to engage in a debate with someone else, though. In fact, you can always sign up with a dupe account and try again for one or two posts, before I realise it's you.

    Regards.
     
  15. MGCǂSpectre

    MGCǂSpectre
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,997
    I'm older than you kiddo. I'm in 20s you're some immature and arrogant teeny. No one is forcing you to like esports, everyone can say 'I don't like it' but saying everyone who does it is stupid - childish and HILARIOUS! It's like Chess but with a lot more moves, it is actually like saying everyone who plays Chess is stupid. I ask you, who is saying it? Some NOBODY who doesn't even understand esports, the game, patches?

    You talk about balance? Ok I posted in normal manner why you are wrong, you are too inexperienced having played so little to talk about balance. Even I do not have that right or else it's pointless - I see where I am weak and I try to improve. You are CASUAL (even stopped playing as you say) and yet you argue about balance? Last time you played was early game/beta thus the game is bad? Whoa, Hai Thar Mr BRAINIAC

    Do you even have a slight idea how much shit in your comment 'Those who have a brain don't like esports'. You are stupid, don't talk about my intelligence, I have it, see yourself, see your silly posts, see your arguments. You even continue to argue about things you do not understand, you proved it again, and again, and again.

    Also I told you English is not my native. And yet it is quite understandable? Don't make these pointless notes, whenever I'm doing an exam on Writing I am careful, as for you on a f-o-r-u-m, it's hardly worth it. I type fast, I don't care did I miss a comma or did I change the word order.

    Also your tactic to provoke people so that they look bad while you talk shit with insulting a whole community will not help you.

    DO NOT ARGUE ABOUT THINGS FOR WHICH YOU DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH COMPETENCY

    It's wrong and you look foolish, you proved it so many times! Keep your dislikes to yourself, don't call people doing things you don't like 'no brainers' especially when they have more brain than you.
     
    Last edited: Apr 8, 2012
  16. Dr Super Good

    Dr Super Good
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Messages:
    21,164
    You balance games for the best of players, not for the worst of players. Especially since StarCraft II is a professional game, it would be stupid if lower leagues were balanced as it will mean that higher leagues are not. This is the number one rule of game design which all good companies follow.

    I also beta tested StarCraft II. The actual beta was for testing server capacities and getting ballence feedback from professional players. Unless you have the skill to use what you are given fully, you cannot make any comment on how to change it.

    You are aware that those systems were all designed by full time Blizzard employees? Most specifically they were designed by the people employed as directors and designers / software engineers. Interns have to follow what they get told to do which is all decided by those guys. No company it its right mind would allow inters the direct final word over the design of a product (the people responsible will at least review such ideas in which case they become their decision).

    Not in StarCraft II and Diablo III. Those are all professional full-time voice actors. Especially Deckard Cain.

    Blizzard is not responsible that some people lack the qualifications to use their tools. Any university graduate could pick up the tool and learn how to do most things in a few hours.

    All code commits they perform are checked over by full time members of staff before being allowed into the game. You should be blaming the people that are full time staff for any problems and not the people they get for a few weeks.

    It makes it the ultimate counter to Mutalisks. Before you had to hover dangerously close to the weapon range of Mutalisks to hit them which allowed them to get the odd shot off while now you can keep your distance and watch the Mutalisks melt while never being able to touch you. Also makes them more effective against all other air units that they are not designed to counter.

    Seeing as there are very few "Psionic" units in the game this was a major nerf for the Ghost. It will no longer be able to snipe down Brood Lords, Infesters, Hydralisks, and most air units. Snipe now is virtually useless against Zerg. It still keeps its role as a High Templar killer but you must remember that 1 feedback from a high templar will kill a fully charged Ghost so it is still a show down of micro. It is mildly more effective against Sentries and other Ghosts as they are the only other Psionic units that see real use (Archons are too buff for Snipe and Dark Templars are specialist units).

    This has nothing to do with "Blink Rushers". It was to delay Blink micro which could be used to reduce Stalker loss by blinking heavily damaged Stalkers into the back before being killed so they remained in combat dealing damage while the enemy would change target to a full health stalker. Especially early game this is very devastating as you can keep Stalker casualties very low which give you a large army advantage. Play StarCraft Masters custom map if you want to see how effective Blink micro management is as that has many exercises to show off how powerful Blink is. This includes how Blink can counter tanks in Siege mode, how to kill large armies of Roaches with no losses and how to win against overwhelming odds with the help of Blink.

    Was required to prevent you from using Infesters to snipe out every single strong unit when on an offensive. 5 Infesters against 7 Thors and the Infesters would win easily. Neural Parasite is still very good but the low range makes if very risky to execute. Remember that the range is only for casting, once cast there is no limit to the range (at least I think so) so you can retreat the Infesters.

    Now, yes, but not in the past. A single Ghost could snipe out a Brood Lord very easily and in professional play you are lucky to see more than just a few Brood Lords. Now with the damage nerf to Snipe that no longer happens as it takes about twice as many casts of Snipe to kill a Brood Lord. In fact Ghosts are useless against Zerg with exception of EMP which is useful against Infesters to kill their Energy.

    Until you post some actual useful evidence that does not prove what I am saying you will be better to not post at all.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.