Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkness-4ever
Reason why I left that in there, not "anyone" can put up whatever they want on domains like that, for the most part its controlled and generally accepted statements, data, ideas etc. that are placed there.
|
Some have strict regulations about what they publish but the majority do not, and not just in the .com and .net top level domains. Universities often allow their users to publish their own personal web sites.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkness-4ever
One of the reason's wikipedia is .com
|
Wikipedia, and the Wikimedia foundation in general, are all .org. Also, Wikipedia is highly moderated. The admins there can block IPs and accounts. Not to mention the hoards of people who willingly devote their time to reverting abuse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkness-4ever
But based on your statement then it is utterly useless to cite anything at all online if you actually believe what you said applies to any and all sites, for that matter
|
I don't recognize any current methods of measuring qualification. Mostly because there really isn't anybody who is qualified to regulate qualification itself.
It turns out you really don't need to trust a source to derive information from it. If you want to go for any real accuracy, you don't go by some "credible" publication. The only way to get accurate information without conducting the experiments yourself is to read a vast collection of sources and determine what is reliably verified.
One person can always lie, but the crowd sucks at lying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkness-4ever
Would you actually watch experiments upon experiments of something like marijuana being performed and furthermore understand the results and properly interpret their meaning?
|
Not marijuana, no, because it does not interest me. :P