[System] MissileRecycler

Nestharus · 03-31-2012, 04:12 AM

Ahem, I did use one aspect of his code, and that was the idea of using timestamps for recycling rather than timers ^)^. That was a good idea, so I took it. I just added credit to my submission for that idea as the implementation was the same.

I did not add credit for the idea of recycling dummies with unit facing as the implementations for that were drastically different. I only added credit for implementations that I took from him, and the only one I took was the timestamp one. He may say that I'm using queues as well, but the idea to use queues did not come from his resource or from his suggestions, which is why he isn't getting credited for their use.

And no, I am not attempting to one up his resource because of some ego. I need a Dummy Recycler and I refuse to use his because his implementation is bad. Him changing his implementation to my implementation is ofc messed up to say the least.

edit
btw, thanks Phtes for talking some sense into me about him stealing my work.

edit
If you support Dummy's API and fix the angle stuff and then give credit for all of the implementations of mine, then we could have both resources up with my 2 styles idea (your safety style and my safety style). Just please be sure to give credit where credit is due as I spent a long time on that design. Also, you could keep it as the round robin design, add support for Dummy's API, and then keep it as your own stuff as the round robin thing was yours =). From here, we'd have two different dummy recyclers with two different behaviors and pros/cons to each one =). Ofc, we'd really need to weigh the pros/cons of the round robin style vs the other style as I don't know if the extra unit creation/destruction is worth it.

Bribe · 03-31-2012, 07:27 AM

Nestharus I'm going to have to assume you are ip spoofing and trolling me. You can implement a better model all you want but the key elements that provide UTILITY here were designed by myself and the queue idea was anitarfs. I spent a lot of effort coining up with the original implementation and making sure it didn't bug, I don't care how much time you spent on your rewrite of my resource you are notorious for not giving credit and this is just another example of it. I will ask ralle for a different approval system like you asked for, because you're using a lot of really dirty tactics.

Nestharus · 03-31-2012, 07:28 AM

Phtes is one of my friends that used to mod. I asked him for his advice on the matter on msn.

And btw, you can look in the docs. I've already given you credit for everything that I used from your implementation.

edit
And btw, I think that you are being slightly crazy right now. We're both in chatroom waiting for you, but I don't know how much longer he'll stay on =o, so hurry up >.<

edit
Also, I know that you put a lot of effort into this, which is why I was being nice and so on, I just found it unfair for you to take my implementations, which is again why I asked Phtes for advice on msn.

Bribe · 03-31-2012, 07:54 AM

It's easy to log in twice on the chat room as well, I really just can't take you seriously. Especially not with this guy having only 1 post. How long did it take for you to add TheDamien to the credits of ASCII? But with Cohadar's JassHelper we can graveyard the newer implementations anyway. But that won't happen because I would want to graveyard a lot of your rewrites if I were thinking about it objectively and not siding with you so much of the time.

Nestharus · 03-31-2012, 07:57 AM

The new version has new functions that Cohador's version does not ;\, which is why I didn't call for it to be gy'd.

And seriously Bribe, you are being crazy. Everyone in chatroom is waiting for u.

edit
btw, using 2 accounts is an offense that you can be banned for (it's very serious). IF you seriously think I am using two accounts, then contact Ralle about it.