 |   |  |  |
| Console Games Discuss Nintendo, PlayStation, Xbox and other console platforms or games in this forum. |
 |
10-31-2007, 12:11 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
^^
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,366
|
[PC] Crysis -- Can YOU manage to run the game?
So there we go, the greatest graphics in a game, and all the hype so far is well deserved.
But The system specs needed to run the game are huge.
So can your computer even run that beast?
|
|
|
|
11-01-2007, 11:06 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Helghast
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,454
|
Christ, i JUST barely make the requirements. only 1 gig of ram though, shit.
__________________
Quote:
[19-22-56] Massive_attack: 8 ball, am i a sexy beast ?
[19-22-57] Hakeem: Massive_attack: It is certain.
[19-23-02] Massive_attack: Owned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-01-2007, 11:47 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Trashcat says no.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 461
|
ahahah i have ati radeon 9800, i played in the beta of it, and in my opinion, the gameplay was genericccccccccccc, in typical EA fashioon, and it looked like crap, but yeah i can JUST barely run it.
__________________
The fox is swift and silent, but the fox who knows of the shadow, is swift, silent, and impossible to detect until it's to late...
|
|
|
|
|
11-03-2007, 01:11 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Watch out, Dr. Wily!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 575
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow_Fox
ahahah i have ati radeon 9800, i played in the beta of it, and in my opinion, the gameplay was genericccccccccccc, in typical EA fashioon, and it looked like crap, but yeah i can JUST barely run it.
|
Don't say silly things like "it looked like crap" because it makes you sound...well, silly. The game, regardless of how it plays, looks incredible. Even on a lower setting it still would, and with the insane requirements it pushes, even on the basest options it should still look pritty.
|
|
|
|
|
11-03-2007, 07:04 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
^^
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,366
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow_Fox
it looked like crap.
|
You have officially lost all credibility.
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2007, 03:52 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Community Moderator
Songs for the Deaf
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,031
|
I can run the beta on maxxed everything in DX9 with 0 lag.
/win.
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2007, 03:42 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
^^
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,366
|
Well... it IS DX9, so it's less fancy.
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2007, 05:51 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Community Moderator
Songs for the Deaf
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,031
|
Hardly. The only reason I can't run it on max on DX10 is because I don't have Vista reinstalled yet :p
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2007, 06:22 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Trashcat says no.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 461
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WILLTHEALMIGHTY
You have officially lost all credibility.
|
i was running it from BELOW minimum requirements. So of course it looks like crap, my GFX card is like 3 years old.
__________________
The fox is swift and silent, but the fox who knows of the shadow, is swift, silent, and impossible to detect until it's to late...
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2007, 07:13 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Community Moderator
Songs for the Deaf
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,031
|
Lol, my old one is 7.
/win.
the 9800 is really, really, really great card (and the best you could buy before X and HD series came along) but alas it is finally showing its age.
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2007, 07:55 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Trashcat says no.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 461
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brad.dude03
Lol, my old one is 7.
/win.
the 9800 is really, really, really great card (and the best you could buy before X and HD series came along) but alas it is finally showing its age.
|
Meh i was just giving a rough estimate, i really have no idea how old my card is, but if your talking about the ATI 9800 [radeon], thats what i have, yeah its really good, but it is old now. (edit: double checking i've had this card since 2002-2003).
__________________
The fox is swift and silent, but the fox who knows of the shadow, is swift, silent, and impossible to detect until it's to late...
|
|
|
|
|
11-04-2007, 08:26 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Community Moderator
Songs for the Deaf
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,031
|
Yep that's about the same time it came out. 2003 methinks, because mine the 7500, was bleeding edge in 2001 xD
But my buddy had a 9800 Pro forever. It was solid, 128 MB memory, great performance, though some people did have problems with heatsinks and the cards overheating.
Other then that though it was awesome :P
Now if only ATi could reincarnate it and make a card as awesome as it for the DX10 lineup, we'd be set.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|  |  |  |  |   |  |
|
